ST 3 / cet 1 / 
Swimming Speed, Stroke Rate and Stroke Length During
Maximal 100 M Freestyle Swim in Boy-Swimmers 11-16 Years of Age

ORIGINAL ARTICLE


Vorontsov, A.R. and Binevsky, D.A. (2002).
Swimming Speed, Stroke Rate and Stroke Length
               DuringMaximal 100 M Freestyle Swim in Boy-Swimmers 11-16 Years of Age.
               IX International Symposium "Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming",
               University of Saint-Etienne (France), 21-23 June 2002.


1.  Abstract

2.  Introduction
            
3.  Methods and Subjects

4.  Results and Discussion

5.  Conclusions
          
References

©

 

Swimming Speed, Stroke Rate and Stroke Length
During Maximal 100 M Freestyle Swim
in Boy-Swimmers 11-16 Years of Age




1) Andrei R.Vorontsov, 2) Dimitry A.Binevsky

1) Amateur Swimming Federation of Great Britain, Bath, UK.
2) Russian State Academy of Physical Education, Moscow.

Vorontsov's presentation:
IX International Symposium "Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming",
University of Saint-Etienne (France), 21-23 June 2002.

 

 

 

1. Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the age dynamics of stroke rate (SR), stroke length (SL) and swimming speed (V) during maximal 100m freestyle swimming in boy-swimmers aged 11-16 years. The subjects of this study were 225 boy-swimmers from 3 swimming schools and the State College of Olympic Reserves (Moscow). Each swimmer performed maximal 100m freestyle swim from a dive. The swim was recorded using a video camera (frequency 50 Hz) and VHS-VCR installed on a trolley, which accompanied a swimmer along the pool deck throughout the entire swim. Video records of swimming with electronic time data were processed and velocity of “pure” swimming at 4 different sections of the 100m race, as well as SR and SL for each lap of “pure” swimming were calculated. No age-related differences were found for average and lap-by-lap values of SR. In all ages the uniformed lap-to-lap decrease of SR was established. SL during the race changed insignificantly. The decrease of V toward the end of 100m race in all age cohorts should be attributed primarily to the decrease of SR.

Key words: young swimmers, stroke rate, stroke distance, swimming velocity.

 

2. Introduction

Stroke rate (SR) and stroke length (SL) ratio as well as changes of racing speed (V) during competitive swimming are widely regarded as macro characteristics of  sport  technique and its efficiency. The dynamics of these characteristics during competitive swimming was the subject of numerous investigations (Haljand et al., 1984; Lipsky, Abramov, 1988, Wakayoshi et al., 1992; Wirtz W., Wilke K. & Zimmermann F., 1992; Pyne & Trewin, 2001 and many others). The subjects of those studies were physically matured elite athletes able to control and voluntary change the SR and SL during the race in order to reduce the decrease of the swimming speed due to accumulation of fatigue.

Young swimmers learn to control the structure and efficiency of the movement  while they grow up and mature in the process of  a 5-7- year training program. During that time they pass through pre-pubescent and pubescent stages of ontogenesis when rapid physical growth and motor development take place. Significant changes in body build, motor abilities and fitness may be reflected in the “macro” structure and efficiency of sport techniques. Knowledge of the age particulars and year-by-year dynamics of technical characteristics may allow us to control and correct the process of technical preparation in young swimmers.

The purpose of this study was to establish the age dynamics of SR, SL and swimming speed in young swimmers (boys aged 11-16 years) during a maximal swimming 100m freestyle and thus to establish the formation of special swimming skills during the growth from 11 to 16 years of age.

 

 

 

3. Methods and Subjects

The subjects of this study were 225 boy-swimmers 11 to 16 years of age from 3 swimming schools and the State College of Olympic Reserves (Moscow). The experiment was held in the 50m swimming pool of the Russian State Academy of Physical Education. Each swimmer performed a maximal 100m freestyle swim from a dive. Only those swims with a time less than PB+2 s (personal best time + 2 s) were taken into consideration.

For the purpose of this study the entire distance was conditionally split into 4 sections:
0-25m, 25-50m, 50-75m and 75-100m.  Both sides of the swimming lane  (in all cases it was the same lane – 3rd lane from the camera) were marked with pairs of black buoys – 7.5 meters from starting edge and 5m and 2.5m before the turning wall. This was done in order to exclude the effect of the starting dive, turn and gliding on calculation of the speed of “pure” swimming, SR and SL.

Each swim was recorded using a video camera (recording frequency 50 Hz) and VHS-VCR with TV display installed on a trolley. The trolley, towed by operator-camera men, accompanied each swimmer along the pool deck throughout the entire swim. During recording operator kept swimmer’s image in the middle of TV display. The optical axis of the camera was perpendicular to the swimming direction. The starting sound signal was synchronized with a flashlight to indicate the beginning of the race on videotape. A signal from an electronic timer was recorded on the same videotape as the swimming race throughout the time of video recording.

Video records of swimming with electronic time data were processed and the following characteristics were calculated:

-          velocity of “pure” swimming (V) in 4 different sections within the 100m swim,

-          SR and SL at each lap of “pure” swimming.

SR (cycles · min-1) for each lap was determined as:

0.5·APn : tn   x 60    

where  APnthe number of arm pulls (each arm pull constitutes a half of freestyle’s swimming cycle) completed by a swimmer at each segment of “pure” swimming and tn - time of “pure” swimming  at every “quarter” of the race.                                               

SL at every lap of “pure” swimming were determined as length of lap divided by SR.

Hence:

SR1= 0.5·AP1 (from 7.5 to 25) /t1 · 60;        SL1 = (25-7.5)/ SR1 ; 

SR2= 0.5·AP2 (from 25 to 47.5) /t2 · 60;      SL2= (47.5-25) /SR2 ;

SR3=0.5·AP3 (from 55 to 75) /t3 · 60;         SL3=(75-55)/SR3;

SR4=0.5·AP4 (from 75 to 100) /t4 · 60;        SL4=(100-75) /SR4.

Average values of V, SR and SL per distance were calculated based on individuals’ average values. T-statistics (ANOVA, SPSS) was used to establish significance of the differences in V, SR, and SL between age cohorts and lap-by-lap changes of V, SR, and SL within each age cohort (results of analysis are given in Supplementum, tables 4 and 5).

 

 

4. Results and Discussion

1. Dynamics of the  “pure” swimming speed during 100-m swimming.

The data in table 1 contains the values of “pure” swimming speed (V) in each of the 4 sections and the average “pure” V during 100m freestyle race in boy-swimmers  11-16 years of age.

Within each age group the same tendency was revealed - swimming speed decreased from the first lap to the last (p<0.01-0.001). Comparison of the data for consecutive ages shows that swimming speed values at every lap of “pure” swimming and average racing speed in the 100m freestyle event increased with the age of the swimmer. On the basis of year-by-year differences we assume that the most rapid growth of the V occurs from 11 to 13 years of age. A slow increase of V at 13-14 years is followed by a second acceleration from 14 to 16 years of age.

 

 

Table 1. Swimming speed (V (m·s-1)) at consecutive laps during maximal 100-m freestyle swim 
             
in
boy-swimmers 11-16 years of age. Values are mean + SD.

___________________________________________________________________________

                                                     A   g   e      C  o  h  o  r  t  s  

Lap

11 (n=39)

12 (n=30)

13 (n=36)

14 (n=47)

15 (n=37)

16 (n=36)

1-st  25 m

1.19+0.09

1.33+0.12

1.53+0.08

1.60+0.09

1.68+0.08

1.70+0.09

2-nd 25 m

1.09+0.19

1.19+0.12

1.43+0.08

1.54+0.09

1.56+0.08

1.65+0.06

3-d   25 m

1.06+0.09

1.13+0.16

1.40+0.10

1.40+0.07

1.44+0.09

1.55+0.06

4-th  25 m

1.01+0.18

1.11+0.21

1.28+0.08

1.40+0.06

1.40+0.10

1.54+0.07

Average

1.09+0.10

1.19+0.13

1.41+0.16

1.48+0.11

1.52+0.07

1.61+0.06

___________________________________________________________________________

 

 

2. Dynamics of the SR during 100-m swimming.

The age dynamics of  the values of SR and SL during competitive swimming in 100m freestyle represents high interest because swimming speed is the derivative namely from SR and SL. The values of SR during 100m swimming for each age group are shown in Table 2. It should be noted that the mean values of swimming tempo are almost identical in all age cohorts. The values of SR found in boys 11-16 years of age were much higher than those reported by Pyne and Trewin (2001) for the finalists of the Sydney Olympic Games competing in the 100m freestyle, but very close to the values of SR demonstrated by Olympians in the 50m freestyle. As we assumed before these studies, SR in young swimmers should decrease with the age due to somatic growth and the increase of strength and endurance. Nevertheless, we did not establish any consistent and significant decrease of average SR with age (see Supplementum, table 4). In every age cohort we found young swimmers with high as well as low SR.

 

Table 2. Stroke Rate (cycles · min-1) at consecutive laps during maximal 100-m freestyle swim
             
in boy-swimmers 11-16 years of age. Values are mean + SD.

___________________________________________________________________________

                                                     A   g   e      C  o  h  o  r  t  s

Lap

11 (n=39)

12 (n=30)

13 (n=36)

14 (n=47)

15 (n=37)

16 (n=36)

1-st    25 m

63.4+  9.3

61.4+  5.8

64.1+  6.4

65.9+  5.6

65.6+  8.7

62.2+  5.6

2-nd  25 m

60.4+  5.2

56.9